despite everything, it's still you.
assailanting:
“ OH SHIT
”

assailanting:

OH SHIT

it-s-gone-blue:

lesbianrey:

image

wow i love my literal father justin mcelroy

but wait–there’s more! youtube playlist here 

doctorwhogeneration:

image

I screamed at this

asecualhand:

xneferpitou:

0l0x:

2018 Grinch has no edge. He’s got no bite. He’s not even that much of an asshole. He’s just a sassy gay furry with unusually nice teeth despite his famous theme song declaring otherwise.

1966 Grinch? Now that was a mean, scary bastard. He was a crusty old fuck who hated society so much that he only came off his shitty frozen mountain to commit crimes and terrorism out of spite.

Bennyhoo Cumberland Grinch comes down from his mountain to buy groceries.

You can round the edges off a character to make them more “relatable” or whatever, but you also run the risk of losing what defined them in the first place. The end result is bland and generic.

2018 Grinch is a reflection of modern society’s rejection of real character flaws in the interest of being “unproblematic” and in this essay i will

What was your opinion on the Jim Carrey grinch?

Jim Carrey Grinch said bitch, ate glass and threw a whole child in the garbage. He is an absolute champ and the only rightful heir to the throne.

frogandtoadaregays:

frogandtoadaregays:

“spider ham and spidernoir are the new roger + jessica rabbit” implying spidernoir is just, irresistibly sexy

two types of responses to this post:

•that’s because he is irresistibly sexy

and

•bold of you to assume spidernoir is the sexy one

pandadistractions:

pandadistractions:

beefmonsters:

stuckinthisgodforsakenhellhole:

acepsychic100:

stuckinthisgodforsakenhellhole:

mp100season2-jesus-christ:

Reminder that

Everyone at studio bones has the hots for Reigen

One:

image
image
image
image

Bones:

image
image
image
image

Don’t forget the thirstiest one

image

Shit you right, I forgot

@pandadistractions

even the animator that does the pain on glass frames wants him

image

and don’t forget:

image

bettedavisgf:

it’s all about reverting to your embarrassing hobbies from 2009 when you realize you were actually right the whole time

terpsikeraunos:

catastrophic-success:

terpsikeraunos:

on the one hand there are many aspects of academia that should be criticized but on the other hand i’m concerned about the rise of anti-intellectualism as a tool of fascism

Hey yo what the fuck does this say in English? Because if you can’t explain in layman’s terms you’re not doing a good job of getting your point across to everyone.

1. we are right to criticize the many problems in higher education

2. fascists manipulate people into hating anyone involved in higher education for supposedly looking down on them and being worthless to the “real world.” as a result, funding for education is cut, especially for the arts, no one listens to historians who point out that history is repeating itself or speak out against the regime, freedom of speech is lost in favor of the party line, and/or climate change kills us all since no one listens to scientists.

3. therefore, when we criticize higher education, we should be careful not to contribute to fascist tropes that claim that having knowledge is bad/smug/out of touch/useless to society.

if u ever think u overplay a song please just know that when me n my sibs were kids our mom sang “i’ll make a man out of you” from mulan in the shower every morning for three years

truereset:

some of you have never treated a cat with enough love and kindness to experience their adoration and trust and it shows

flutejesus:

parenyzia:

if-i-am-not-for-me:

tilthat:

TIL: A Harvard professor experimented on 22 unwitting students, assaulting their belief systems to see what damage could be caused. One of them became the Unabomber.

via ift.tt

The way this went was: each student was asked to write an essay describing their “personal philosophy”, essentially their worldview. These essays were then given to experienced prosecution attorneys and FBI interrogators. The students were placed in a room with these people, without being told who they were, and instructed to have a conversation about their essay. Except the task given to the lawyers and interrogators was to take the student’s “personal philosophy” apart piece by meticulous piece.

This experiment was part of MK Ultra and was an exercise in destroying personalities. They were testing out and refining methods of breaking spies on unwitting college students.

Ted Kaczynski was 17 when he was subjected to this experiment. His code name in the documentation? “Lawful”

here’s the actual article link instead of blog link:
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2000/06/harvard-and-the-making-of-the-unabomber/378239/

Jesus fucking Christ